New Publication: Approaches for Using CMIP Projections in Climate Model Ensembles to Address the ‘Hot Model’ Problem
Incorporating Climate and Environmental Justice into Research and Resource Management
NC CASC welcomes new Tribal Liaison with Great Plains Tribal Water Alliance
New Report: Climate Change in Colorado
New “Innovation in Climate Adaptation” Report from CASC Network and Partners
Upcoming webinar: February 8, 2024
When
Assessing Drought in the Era of Climate Change
NC CASC’s James Rattling Leaf, Sr. quoted in Tribal collaboration article
Intense periods of drought across the western U.S. present severe threats to a wide range of shareholders tasked with managing natural resources. In an era of intensifying human-driven climate change, the severity and frequency of these droughts will likely increase ( Cravens et al., 2021 ). While managing water is a critical approach to mitigating and responding to drought, water management does not encompass the wide array of impacts, management strategies, and shareholders related to drought management. For example, aridification from lack of precipitation has agricultural and natural resource implications. Effective drought response involves interdisciplinary collaboration and the expertise and experience of diverse actors including private landowners, business owners, scientists, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and managers and policymakers within Tribal, local, state, and federal government agencies. However, it is not clear how their differing professional, cultural, educational, and jurisdictional expertise can complicate collaboration. A team of researchers funded by the Climate Adaptation Science Centers (CASCs) sought to understand the strengths, weaknesses, and outcomes of these interdisciplinary collaborations to understand how and why the diverse actors involved in making decisions about drought take certain actions. Their analysis resulted in a typology to support actors navigating complex drought management projects that accounts for multiple scales and dynamics of drought choices. Typologies help capture important aspects of a concept, process, activity, or network ( Cravens et al., 2021 ) to provide a high-level understanding of that concept, process, activity, or network. Without a drought decision-making typology, issues that arise from complexity and subject-matter discrepancies may remain unchecked. Using a typology, actors can streamline the process of understanding the complexity of their drought issue and correct potential stakeholder exclusion, unexpected impacts, or partner misunderstandings early in project/management plan development phases.
Contact Us
Want to see more? Do you have feedback? Was this site helpful? Send us an email!